Federico Bottino
A still life on a windowsill in New York — a sunburst mirror catches the room
Mirrors in the sun. New York.

Beyond work, music (especially hip-hop), films, and storytelling are among the deepest influences on how I think, create, and make sense of the world.

Professional work.

I currently serve as —

Read the full bio →·LinkedIn ↗

Selected publications.

All publications →

Bloc-Conditional Event States

Measuring Cross-Coverage Divergence for Threat-Intelligence Analysis

Paper — Maryam Fooladi, Federico Bottino, Alberto Trivero — NLPAICS 2026 — Alicante, Spain, 2026

Open-source intelligence relies heavily on source-level signals — domain provenance, amplification patterns, account coordination — which work against fabricated infrastructure but offer little leverage on content from established state media that is correctly attributed and passes source-level heuristics. We ask whether framing divergence across editorially-coherent outlet blocs is measurable as a content-level observable, and whether cross-bloc divergence exceeds the editorial polarization already present within a single domestic press tradition. Building on the event-state (ρ_e) density-matrix formalism of Bottino et al. (2026), we represent each bloc by a density matrix on a 15-dimensional framing-feature space and compute pairwise trace distances. On two contested events (Hormuz blockade 2026, n = 16, direct state-aligned coverage; Navalny death 2024, n = 14, state-aligned bloc reconstructed via quoted-proxy), the cross-bloc distance between state-aligned and mainstream-Western outlets exceeds the US-right/US-left distance by a factor of roughly 1.8 on both events. Top-eigenvector decomposition attributes the gap to interpretable framing axes — economic consequences and conflict framing on Hormuz, morality on Navalny. We position this as a measurement rather than a classifier; at two events the work characterizes the observable's behavior rather than calibrating thresholds.

OSINT · Framing divergence · Threat intelligence

Source · Read more →

Retrieval Is Not Enough

Why Organizational AI Needs Epistemic Infrastructure

Paper, preprint — Federico Bottino, Carlo Ferrero, Nicholas Dosio, Pierfrancesco Beneventano — arXiv preprint (cs.AI), 2026

Retrieval-Augmented Generation has become the default way of plugging an LLM into a company's documents. Inside real organizations, retrieval alone is not enough. An organization needs to know what it holds to be true, what is contested, what it is committed to, and — above all — what it doesn't know. We present OIDA (Organizational Intelligence and Decision Architecture), a framework that represents organizational knowledge as typed objects with epistemic properties: commitment strength, contradiction status, provenance. The central piece is QUESTION-as-modeled-ignorance: a primitive that turns 'we don't know' into a first-class object the system can plan around, instead of filling the gap with a plausible-sounding sentence. We also propose an Epistemic Quality Score (EQS) to evaluate not how fluent an answer sounds, but how honest it is about what it doesn't know. In our experiments OIDA reaches an EQS of 0.530 with 3,868 tokens, against 0.848 for a full-context baseline that uses 108,687 tokens — about 28× more. The QUESTION mechanism shows a statistically significant effect on outcome quality (Fisher exact, p = 0.0325).

Epistemic infrastructure · Organizational AI · RAG

arXiv · PDF · Read more →

They wrote about me.

Full press archive →
Aristotele, Federico's dog
Lui è Aristotele, il mio cane.

Disclaimer.

Information, contents, thoughts and images contained in this website are not relatable to clients or company I represent or I work with. Everything must be interpreted as personal opinions and private thoughts I just wanted to share with everyone. Thank you!

Back to top ↑